“Verbal Violence?”

Offending People Of Offensive Lifestyles.

World Wide, Federal Laws Crafted To Outlaw The Truths Of The Bible.

Why The World Has Gone Mad Over

Delicate Feelings?

March 11, 2007
By Paul Brown
“Bibliophobic” Hypocrites
Perilous Times Press

     If a person is so delicate and thin-skinned that laws must be passed to stop them from being offended then that person’s lifestyle is no good in the first place. A person who knows they are living right is NOT offended no matter what amount of rhetoric is thrown their way. Why are fornicators, adulterers, abortionists, and gays so thin-skinned? We are not talking about being rude or obnoxious because of a person’s skin color. Any fool who thinks they are superior because of their skin color does not have a personal relationship with the LORD and Maker of the heavens and earth. To be specific, we are talking about proclaiming the evils of certain sins and lifestyles which have become the scourge of society: the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah.

     Why has the world gone mad over federally protecting the feelings of Sodomites? "Waaaaa, you hurt my feelings, I got a  phsycological booboo, and I’m telling the police on you." Why have thousands of years of preaching against homosexuality, backed up by the Holy Scriptures, suddenly become “criminal” in many countries around the world (America is not far from this type of legislation becoming law)? A Christian is not upset when they are mocked for their lifestyle. They rejoice for the honor of being reproached for the name of the LORD Jesus Christ. No law exists which punishes a person for saying a bad thing about being a Christian. So then, why the opposite, unjust, and “Bibliophobic” reaction towards truth and why such fear of the Bible?

     There is an underlying reason for the unjust legislation. Eradicating intolerance is not the true goal especially since Sodomites are very intolerant to people of the Bible. The law is truly one-sided and slanted. The reason for the movement in banishing the Bible and making way for the filthy, twisted lifestyle is the world-wide preparation for the anti-Christ. Any student of the Bible knows the anti-Christ does not regard the “desire of women,” among other things (Dan. 11:37), meaning the world leader will be a homosexual. As the days of Sodom and Gomorrah during Lot's time, so will be the day when the world sees the arrival of the anti-Christ (Luke 17:28-29) and the return of the Son of Man. The contemporary, sodomite movement towards outlawing the scriptures and punishing anyone who speaks against the filthy, sodomite lifestyle is in preparation for the reign of the anti-Christ. The time is just around the corner for this last generation.

LAW OF THE LAND

Diss a 'gay'? Go to jail!

Feb 15, 2007
By Bob Unruh
LAW OF THE LAND
Diss a 'gay'? Go to jail!
2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Activists Warn Christians Targeted Under

 New 'Hate Crimes' Proposal

     Two Christians in Australia have been indicted for criticizing Islam and another for criticizing Zionism. A filmmaker has been threatened with arrest for using the word "homosexual" rather than "gay." Now a German faces jail time for publicly criticizing abortionists, and in Holland, "fornicators" and "adulterers" are protected classes and cannot be criticized. All courtesy of the concept of federal "hate crimes" legislation, which unless defeated soon could be mandatory in the United States, warns a rising chorus of critics.

     "All that matters are the delicate feelings of members of federally protected groups," said Michael Marcavage, director of RepentAmerica.com "Truth is not allowed as evidence in hate crimes trials. …A homosexual can claim emotional damage from hearing Scripture that describes his lifestyle as an abomination. He can press charges against the pastor or broadcaster who merely reads the Bible in public. The 'hater' can be fined thousands of dollars and even imprisoned!" All this, he noted, to attack incidents that according to the FBI's 2005 Uniform Crime Report make up on one-fifteenth of 1 percent of all crimes.

     The language is in a new proposal pending in Congress, H.R. 254, or the David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act. That, according to the National Prayer Network, starts out with a federal police state enforcement of "anti-hate" laws but would, as it has in other parts of the world, "lead inexorably to the end of free speech." The plan is "stealth legislation at its most devious."

     The authors of the new legislation have been clever, inserting in the proposal assertions that because five states do not have hate laws, the federal government has "no choice" but to "enhance federal enforcement of hate crimes." That includes new ranks of federal agents to address the "serious national problem" that exists. Worse yet, there are some key phrases that open doors wide that many people don't want opened. For example the bill is to "prevent and respond to alleged violations," meaning "the government does not even have to wait until a hate crime has been committed but may act pre-emptively to 'prevent' crime." Such cases already have developed in other nations, where the "progressive" effort to "advance" anti-discrimination laws are further down the road, he noted.

     Peter LaBarbera, of Americans for Truth, noted that in Canada and France both, legislators have been fined for publicly criticizing homosexuality. Three years ago, a Swedish hate crimes law was used to put Pastor Ake Green, who preached that homosexuality is a sin, in jail for a month. "And recently, a British couple told how they were denied the chance to adopt because it was determined that their Christian faith might 'prejudice' them against a homosexual child put in their care," LaBarbera added.

     Already in the United States, under Massachusetts' pro-'gay' nondiscrimination law, only agencies that placed children in homosexual-led households would get licensed by the state. No biased agenda here, heh?

     To circumvent the U.S. Constitution's demands for certain circumstances to exist before the federal government can intervene, the legislation blatantly adds the statement that hate crimes actually are "slavery." "Violence motivated by bias is a relic of slavery that can constitute badges and incidents of slavery," the proposal proclaims. Another "absurd ruse" is that "hate criminals affect interstate commerce, by terrorizing their victims into traveling across state lines – or not." "In fact, this ridiculous argument could be used to justify federal intervention in a crime of any kind, since any crime victim might be scared into different spending or traveling choices."

     America's justice system requires proof of physical tangible damage before an arrest, but H.R. 254 changes that. "It seeks to establish a different 'bias motivation' justice system, which will be defined in courts by judges, as has happened in Canada." "Judges will establish legal precedents – precedents that protect groups such as homosexuals not only from physical bias-motivated violence but also from 'verbal violence,' this will include the 'hate speech' of Bible-believing evangelical Christians.” "H.R. 254 thus does more than violate states' rights in law enforcement. It also leads inexorably to an end of free speech!"

     LaBarbera noted that in "post-Christian England," the government even has set out to prosecute "homophobic" speech. "It is almost inconceivable that the same country that gave us the rule of law and limited government – and powerfully gifted Christian preachers like George Whitfield who helped shape America – now bows down to the homosexual revolution of organized sin masquerading as 'civil rights,'" LaBarbera said.

     "Is it progress to empower a legal and cultural revolution that criminalizes the common-sense idea that society should put the welfare of children first by favoring natural parenting (mom and dad) over an experimental version (dad and male lover) that models perversion to innocent children in their own home?" asked LaBarbera.

     In Canada and some European countries, it already is a crime to use the Internet to criticize "federally protected" groups such as homosexuals and Muslims. "In England, two men who called Islam 'wicked' were indicted … and now face seven years in prison."

"Having been charged under Pennsylvania's hate crimes law for declaring the truth about homosexuality, I can assure you that if this bill is passed and signed into law, it will be used to put Christians behind bars," said Marcavage of Repent America.

      And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done. Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
(Dan. 11:36-37)