The Scarlet Beast “EuroBabel”

EU: The Revived Roman Empire

Inhumane, Unjust, And Perverse

I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written,

MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

     And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration (Rev 17:3-6).

The Legend of Europa pictured in the book of Revelation: a woman riding a beast in the sea and a forbidden relationship. Zeus saw Europa alone on the beach and lusted after her. So he transformed himself into a bull and lay down at her feet. She climbed on his back and he plunged with her into the waves of the sea and raped her. She conceived a son, and after her death she received divine honors as "Queen of Heaven."

 The bull became the constellation Taurus.

EuroBabel

EuroBabel

Contender Ministries

http://contenderministries.org/prophecy/romanempirePF.php

     The EU is the revived Roman Empire that will bring about the rise of the Antichrist. It is important to look at the religious symbolism of the EU. After all, riding on the beast’s back will be the harlot that represents a global pagan religious system (Catholicism) that will unite the world and plays a part in the persecution of the saints (Rev. 17).

     The EU flag has a circle of 12 stars on a blue background. These stars were inspired by the halo of 12 stars appearing around the Madonna as depicted in Catholic pictures of the “virgin” Mary. Leon Marchal, former secretary general of the Council of Europe, confirmed that the stars are representative of “the woman of the Apocalypse.” He expounded, “it’s wonderful that we have gotten back to the introit of the new Mass of the Assumption. It’s the corona stellarum duodecim of the woman of the Apocalypse.”

     He is referencing the woman in Revelation 12 who appears with a crown of 12 stars. The Bible uses this symbolism to represent Israel, however the Catholic Church has always claimed that she represents the Virgin Mary, “the mother of God.” A leaflet titled “Building Europe Together” states that “The European flag is a shared flag, blue with 12 gold stars symbolizing completeness. The number will remain 12 no matter how many countries there are in the European Union.”

     The anthem of the EU “Ode to Joy” also contains religious symbolism. “Ode to Joy” is the prelude to the last movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which has religious implications. EU publications state that the anthem really is an “ode to freedom, community, and peace,” however the lyrics, by Friedrich von Schiller, are actually about the entering of the shrine of a pagan goddess and the uniting of all men in brotherhood, by the power of magic.

     Further evidence of a religious side to the European Union is a poster that was issued by the EU, showing the tower of Babel. The poster carried the slogan “Many tongues, one voice.” As if the celebration of the pagan tower that led God to confuse the languages of a defiant people (Genesis 11) isn’t enough, a crane in the background was shown rebuilding the tower. Now, once again, a rebellious people are rebuilding mystery Babylon. In a parliament building in Strasbourg, France, you will find an enormous replica of the unfinished tower of Babel that the secular press has named “Eurobabel.”

     If that religious symbolism seems too obscure to be that significant, perhaps a snapshot of Revelation 17 will peak your interest in the religious symbolism of the EU. Revelation 17 depicts a great harlot riding on a beast. The beast in Revelation 17 represents the world government and the great harlot is a global religion that will ride in on its back. This harlot riding a beast was used when Britain issued a stamp to commemorate the first EU parliament election in 1979. It is now the official picture of the EU, and is painted on the dome of the parliament building in Brussels. It is also pictured on the same building that holds the “Eurobabel.”

     The EU constitution has also raised the ire of protestant leaders by banning the mention of Christianity as part of Europe’s cultural heritage, while at the same time, including references to the civilizations of Greece and Rome, and the philosophical heritage of the Enlightenment. EU government representatives excused this revisionist view of history by claiming any mention of Christian values would upset the Muslim population of the EU.

     As you can see, the stage is being set for the emergence of a global political system (the EU, the UN, and other Continental Unions), a global economic system (the Euro and WTO), and a global religious system (the ecumenical movement). The EU fulfills the prophesies of the fourth kingdom that is to come, from which will arise the Antichrist of the end-times. We are encouraged in the Bible to be aware of the signs, we should all be looking up. We soon will be with our Lord.

EuroBabel's Lex Scantinia

     Lex Scantinia (sometimes incorrectly referred to as Lex Scantia) was an ancient Roman law (named after aedile Scantinius Capitolinus who had lived around 225 BC) and introduced in 149 BC during the Roman Republic that regulated sexual behavior, including pederasty (sick perversion), adultery and passivity, potentially legislating the death penalty for same-sex behavior among free-born men. Allegations exist that even before Lex Scantinia such laws existed in Rome, but direct evidence of these laws has been lost.

     For instance, on supplicium fustuarium, public beating to death as the legal standard punishment for same-sex behavior among free-born men in Rome long before Lex scantinia, see Polybius, The Histories, volume VI, chapter 37. All Roman laws, including Lex Scantinia, regulating sexual behavior only expanded towards free-born citizens. Slaves were considered as res, as things, and could be freely used for any activity otherwise illegal (in other words sick perverts of the empire could not rape children unless they were declared as things [demon possessed sickos]). Other than opposite-sex activities, same-sex activities with slaves were however not encouraged as a form of sexual pleasure. In fact, same-sex activities were rather regarded as punishment for bad slaves, inherently identical to beatings.

Mitterrand’s Lex Scantinia Goes Unpunished

"The Bad Life"

Nephew Of François Mitterrand “Enormously Excited”

10-08-2009

Nephew of François Mitterrand “enormously excited” by the slave market in young boys

http://www.blacklistednews.com/news-5868-0-15-15--.html

     The revelations in his 2005 autobiography “The Bad Life” have come back to haunt Mr Mitterrand after he emerged as one of the most vociferous defenders of Roman Polanski, the film director currently detained in Switzerland in connection with an outstanding conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl in the US in 1977.

     In his book, Mr Mitterrand, the nephew of the late Socialist president François Mitterrand, wrote: “I got into the habit of paying for boys... All these rituals of the market for youths, the slave market excite me enormously. “One could judge this abominable spectacle from a moral standpoint but it pleases me beyond the reasonable.”

     Curiously, there was little outcry when the book was published in 2005. However, Mr Mitterrand’s tastes were brought to the fore on Monday by Marine Le Pen, daughter of the far-right National Front leader, Jean-Marie Le Pen, on a political chat show. Miss Le Pen read out a passage in which Mr Mitterrand wrote: “The profusion of very attractive and immediately available young boys puts me in a state of desire that I no longer need to hinder nor hide ...as I know that I will not be refused.” Her call for his resignation has become an internet hit.

     On Tuesday, the opposition Socialists joined the chorus of outrage. Benoît Hamon, the party spokesman, said: “As a minister of culture he has drawn attention to himself by defending a film maker and he has written a book where he said he took advantage of sexual tourism. To say the least, I find it shocking.” Mr Mitterrand responded on Tuesday by saying he was “flabbergasted.” “If the National Front drag me through the mud then it is an honour for me. “If a leftist politician drags me through the mud then it is a humiliation for him,” he added. Xavier Bertrand, the head of Mr Sarkozy’s right-wing UMP party, defended Mr Mitterrand. “The Socialists are now on the same ground as the extreme right, it’s incredible. One is not obliged to use private life for political ends,” he said.

     Mr Mitterrand, who joined the cabinet in June, was considered a great catch for Mr Sarkozy and proof of his “open” style of government; the minister comes from a grand Socialist family and is admired by many in the Left-wing cultural establishment. Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, the first lady, was said to have had a hand in his nomination. Politicians from across the spectrum criticised his vitriolic attack on the arrest of Mr Polanski, a French citizen who US authorities wish to extradite over his 1977 conviction. Mr Mitterrand initially described the pursuit of the director as “callous” and “absolutely horrifying,” but then toned down his criticism.

EuroBable Euthanasia

Cito necatus insignis ad deformitatem puer esto.

An obviously deformed child must be put to death.

      In the Netherlands a five-day waiting period is required between the initial consultation and the performance of an induced abortion. The procedure must be performed in a licensed hospital or clinic. Abortion is allowed after 13 weeks (up to 24 weeks) if she claims to be in a state of distress. Since November 1984, women in the Netherlands have been able to obtain abortions free of charge under the government-sponsored national health insurance system. Foreigners may have abortions in the Netherlands, but they have to pay.

Elderly Euthanasia

Times Online

Sarah-Kate Templeton, Health Editor

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article6869646.ece

     An 80-year-old grandmother who doctors identified as terminally ill and left to starve to death has recovered after her outraged daughter intervened. Hazel Fenton, from East Sussex, is alive nine months after medics ruled she had only days to live, withdrew her antibiotics and denied her artificial feeding. The former school matron had been placed on a controversial care plan intended to ease the last days of dying patients.

     Doctors say Fenton is an example of patients who have been condemned to death on the Liverpool care pathway plan. They argue that while it is suitable for patients who do have only days to live, it is being used more widely in the NHS, denying treatment to elderly patients who are not dying. Fenton’s daughter, Christine Ball, who had been looking after her mother before she was admitted to the Conquest hospital in Hastings, East Sussex, on January 11, says she had to fight hospital staff for weeks before her mother was taken off the plan and given artificial feeding.

      Ball, 42, from Robertsbridge, East Sussex, said: “My mother was going to be left to starve and dehydrate to death. It really is a subterfuge for legalized euthanasia of the elderly on the NHS.” Fenton was admitted to hospital suffering from pneumonia. Although Ball acknowledged that her mother was very ill she was astonished when a junior doctor told her she was going to be placed on the plan to “make her more comfortable” in her last days.

     Ball insisted that her mother was not dying but her objections were ignored. A nurse even approached her to say: “What do you want done with your mother’s body?” On January 19, Fenton’s 80th birthday, Ball says her mother was feeling better and chatting to her family, but it took another four days to persuade doctors to give her artificial feeding. Fenton is now being looked after in a nursing home five minutes from where her daughter lives.Peter Hargreaves, a consultant in palliative medicine, is concerned that other patients who could recover are left to die. He said: “As they are spreading out across the country, the training is getting probably more and more diluted.”

Lex Cornelia

     Ancient Rome also had its own set of defamation laws. The Roman laws were strengthened by Tiberius I, when he made defaming the Roman people a treasonous offense. The Emperor Augustus prosecuted libel offenses under this law, famously deporting Cassius Severus for defaming prominent Romans in his writings. “The Roman law of defamation punished severely those who circulated criticisms of the ruling groups,” writes attorney David Riesman. Defaming magistrates of the Roman republic, or emperors under the Roman empire could carry the death sentence.

     This idea, that a citizen could be punished for speaking ill of a government official, is something the U.S. Supreme Court has attempted to prevent by making it extremely difficult for public figures to seek damages in defamation cases. “Political freedom ends when government can use its powers and its courts to silence its critics.… [D]efamation of the government is an impossible notion for a democracy.” writes law professor Harry Kalven Jr.

     This major change in American common law came in 1964 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case. In its ruling, the Court adopted the standard of actual malice, which makes it extremely difficult for public officials to win defamation cases. “The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with ‘actual malice’—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not,” writes Justice Brennan in the Supreme Court decision. Subsequent court rulings extended the standard to cover all public figures and not just public officials.

     The genesis of much modern Western defamation law is the Roman law of injury caused by insulting behaviour and scandalous libels. Roman law was concerned with attacks on a person's honour and reputation rather than with freedom of expression. The Roman jurist Ulpian noted that, under the Lex Cornelia:

     If someone composes, writes or publishes something tending to bring another into hatred, ridicule or contempt, or maliciously causes this to be done, even though it be published in the name of another, or even anonymously, he can be sued under this law and if he is found guilty, he will be declared untrustworthy so that his word cannot be given in Court, nor can he make a will. And by a decree of the Senate the same fate awaits anyone who publishes a scurrilous epigram or anything else of the like, even in shorthand, and anyone who offers such things for sale or purchase.

Rome II Law

Rome II Law

Florida Security Council

http://www.floridasecuritycouncil.org/

     An EU Regulation immediately becomes law in all member states, and the Parliament has just amended a Regulation known as 'Rome II' that decides what happens when the laws of two countries contradict each other and no contract is in place to decide the outcome. The Council of Ministers had opposed a previous extension of the Regulation to include privacy and defamation, but the Parliament has voted to re-include it. The deadlock is likely to proceed to the formal conciliation procedure, where MEPs and Ministers in equal numbers will attempt to find a compromise.

     The Rome II Regulation is designed to govern cross-border disputes where there is no contract, and covers a large number of areas. Privacy and defamation have been the most controversial, though. The Parliament's amendment suggests that in the case of print or broadcast media the law which should apply in disputes is the law of the country to which the publication or broadcast is most directed. If that is not an easy fact to determine, the relevant law will be the one of the country where editorial control is exercised.

     Member States do not want the complex formula to be introduced. Media organizations are likely to back the plans because the other option is for the applicable law to be that of the country in which the defamed person lives. They argue that that would mean that media companies would have to know the privacy and defamation laws of every European country.

Defaming The Bad EuroBabel People Is An Offense

     Geert Wilders is a Dutch politician, member of Parliament in the Netherlands and leader of the Party for Freedom. He has been outspoken on the issues of Islamic extremism and freedom of speech. His provocative 2008 film about Islam in the Netherlands, FITNA, has received international attention and condemnation. For his views, he has been forced into guarded isolation, banned in the UK, indicted in his own country for violating "hate-speech" laws, and wanted in Jordan.

     As European radical Islam became increasingly powerful, the Western doctrine of free and open speech came under sustained attack. Quickly, this totalitarian movement to suppress Free Speech gained momentum in the Islamic world culminating with a Member of the European Union, Mr. Wilders, being charged by his own country with illegally criticizing Islam, thus violating the "hate-speech" laws of the Netherlands.

I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns. I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.

Dan. 7:7-8