Vain Babblings,
And Oppositions Of Science
Falsely So Called
Real Estate Size of Pin Head Turns Into
Hundreds Of Billions Of Galaxies?
'Start Of The Universe:'
Mini Big Bang Recreated?
…keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen (I Tim. 6:20-21).
In Order For Scientists To Continue In Their Blind Faith
Of The False Religion Of The Big Bang “Fact”
They Have To IGNORE These Premises
1. Ignore the idea that all the galaxies in the universe started out the size of a pinhead and exploded to form all the hundreds of billions of galaxies, each galaxy having about a hundred billion stars with no energy to begin with. Talk about blind faith,; that belief takes an enormous amount of imagination and faith, not to mention energy.
2. Ignore the idea that “Nothing” caused this less-then-a-pinhead sized explosion to take place. After all, if something caused this explosion then there was “Something” before the big bang.
3. Ignore some facts and accept others. Red shift is double that of another star meaning a star is twice as far away, which can be a good assumption of the distance. Oppositions of science must ignore the coincidence that the same light is passing through twice as much dust and gas in space.
4. Ignore or refute the true nature of light and brush off the fact that dust and gas decrease the frequency and the speed of light. With dust and gas in space, the greater the distance, the more that both the frequency and the speed of light would be decreased.
5. Ignore the true nature of light and believe an object can exceed the speed of light and that the mass of an electron emitting light is infinite instead of remaining constant.
6. Ignore glaring contradictions. Believe that the Big Bang and Black Holes do not contradict each other. The Big Bang claims that massive matter explodes. Black Holes in space believers claim that massive matter annihilates itself.
7. Believe somehow there is no gap between the atom and populations containing large numbers of polymeric molecules with variable monomer sequences and a way to select and amplify a specific property. It was proven that genetic information can in fact emerge from random mixtures of polymers, but where did the polymers come from, a random mixture of atoms? Go figure the odds on that one; very unlikely.
'Start Of The Universe': Mini Big Bang Recreated
Nov 08, 2010
'Start of the Universe': mini Big Bang recreated
By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/large-hadron-collider/8117453/Start-of-the-Universe-mini-Big-Bang-recreated.html
Scientists at the Large Hadron Collider have come the closest ever to re-enacting the beginning of the Universe – reproducing conditions a millionth of a second after the Big Bang. Colliding particles of lead at each other at close to the speed of light, they produced heat a million times hotter than the centre of the Sun - temperatures close to those generated at the beginning of time. The series of "mini-Big Bangs" were so powerful, scientists were hopeful they would cause sub-atomic particles to "melt" into their most basic ingredients and bring researchers closer to finding the fundamental building blocks of the Universe. Has the Large Hadron Collider glimpsed the big bang? It was hoped the resulting hot dense "soup" would also prove the existence of a whole new state of matter known as the Quark Gluon Plasma. Quarks are thought to be tiny positive charges which make up protons and neutrons. They are held together by gluons, another kind of sub-atomic particle.
This discovery in turn could lead to the uncovering of one of the fundamental forces that bind everything together. Dr David Evans, a member of the UK team from the University of Birmingham, said there was a lot of cheering "out of joy and relief." "We are thrilled with the achievement," he said. "The collisions generated mini Big Bangs and the highest temperatures and densities ever achieved in an experiment. "At these temperatures even protons and neutrons, which make up the nuclei of atoms, melt resulting in a hot dense soup of quarks and gluons known as a quark-gluon plasma." Scientists, including the Birmingham team led by Dr Evans, will now study the particles in the hope of discovering what holds atoms together and gives them their mass they have a created
The collisions, officially started at 10.20 am today, were produced by firing lead ions – atoms stripped of their electrons – at 0.9999 the speed of light - 670 million miles per hour - in opposite directions around the LHC's underground tunnel at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, near Geneva. Flying in opposite directions, the particles were focused into a narrow beam and forced to collide inside the massive ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) detector. The impacts threw off thousands of particles and generated temperatures of 10 trillion degrees centigrade, as close as we have ever been to reproducing conditions not seen since the Big Bang 13.75 billion years ago. They were 13 times more powerful than the previous record for ion collisions.
Scientists hope the quark-gluon plasma will allow them to learn more about the Strong Force (Daniel 11:38), one of the four fundamental forces of nature. "The Strong Force not only binds the nuclei of atoms together but is responsible for 98 per cent of their mass," said Dr Evans. "I now look forward to studying a tiny piece of what the Universe was made of just a millionth of a second after the Big Bang." The ALICE experiment is just one part of the LHC, whose circular beam tunnel runs for 16.7 miles, 328ft below the French/Swiss border. Up until now scientists have been firing protons around the tunnel which are much lighter than lead ions and so produce less powerful collisions. ALICE is 53ft high and 85ft across and weighs around 10,000 tons. The ALICE experiment involves around 1,000 physicists and engineers from 100 institutes in 30 countries. Britain's contribution includes eight physicists and engineers and seven PhD students from the University of Birmingham.
During the lead ion collisions ALICE will download data at a rate of 1.2 gigabytes per second, producing the equivalent of more than three million CDs-worth of recorded information. Teams using ALICE detector now have to analyze the results before they can confirm the existence of the new particles and matter. It is expected to take weeks if not months before any confirmation of the results.
How Lead Ions Collide
* The lead-ion beams start with a piece of pure lead just under an inch long (2cms) that weighs 500 milligrams (0.017 oz). It is heated to about 500 degrees celsius to vapourize a small number of atoms.
* An electrical current is used to remove a few of the electrons from each atom, and then the newly created ions are slowly accelerated around the LHC until they are electron free.
* When they reach 1.38 teraelectronvolts they are brought into collision in the centre of three detectors which record the debris from the impacts.
Big Bang, Black Holes And The Edwin Hubble Red Shift
Nov. 7, 2010 (2007)
Big Bang, Black Holes and the Edwin Hubble Red Shift
By Robert L. Laing
http://www.intelligentdesigntheory.info/big-bang-black-holes-red-shift.html
Building on what may be a false assumption by Doppler, in 1929 astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble came to what may be a false conclusion that the amount of red shift of light coming from stars and galaxies is related to the velocity of the stars racing away from the earth and the expanding universe theory. The astronomer Hubble also found that the farther the stars are from the earth, the greater the red shift, and therefore, the greater the velocities and the expanding universe theory. Hubble also found that if red shift is double that of another star, that star is twice as far away. This can be a good assumption of the distance, but I discovered that the reason for double the red shift with distance very coincidentally happens to be the same if the light is passing through twice as much dust and gas in space.
The astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble's conclusions led to the questionable conclusion that stars are accelerating away from each other, and the conclusions of subsequent scientists that beyond a certain distance from the earth the stars are traveling at much greater velocities than the speed of light. Yet their hero's Albert Einstein theory said it is impossible for any object to exceed the speed of light because at the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite. If this were true, the mass of any material on earth would increase as its temperature increases, because the frequency of the electron vibrations increase, and hence the velocity of the vibrating electrons increase until the material glows (reaches the frequency of light). If this were sound reasoning, the mass of an electron emitting light is infinite instead of remaining constant.
Both Einstein's theory and astronomer Hubble's discovery were quickly accepted by the scientific community. From this, scientists arrived at the dubious "Big Bang" theory that all the galaxies in the universe started out the size of a pinhead and exploded to form all the hundreds of billions of galaxies, each galaxy having about a hundred billion stars. The Big Bang Theory takes an enormous amount of imagination and faith, and yet was readily accepted. Black holes in space are an evolutionist attempt to prove antimatter and that universes are created and destroyed over and over again.
These false conclusions disregard the obvious violations of the Einstein Relativity and the Speed of Light and the obvious observation that it would be impossible to pack all the enormous amount of matter in the universe into a pinhead. Black Holes in space and what is the Big Bang theory contradict each other. The Big Bang Theory claims that massive matter explodes. Black Holes in space theorists claim that massive matter annihilates itself. Which is true and which is false? Intelligent Design Theory tells us that both Big Bangs in space and Black Holes in space theory are false, as we shall see.
Another possible false theory is the expanding universe theory that the stars are accelerating away from us and the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. This contradicts the Einstein theory that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. The Big Bang would give the stars an initial velocity. They would then decelerate due to gravitational attraction, not accelerate. To counteract this, scientists have now come up with another unproven theory: that empty space has repulsive energy that they call "dark energy"! One false theory begets another.
Astronomer Hubble's conclusion from red shift is in direct opposition to the Einstein theory of constancy of the speed of light. Red shift of light is not caused by velocity, but by dust and gas. Scientists explain the conflict with the speed of light not as a slowing of the speed of light, but as a slowing of the frequency of the light as the stars move away from us due to the expanding universe theory. Einstein's theory that all motions are relative is ignored. According to Einstein, to one standing on a star, there is no motion, and hence no change of frequency of the light leaving it. Einstein taught that the speed of light is independent of the velocity of the source, and the speed of light is constant in every direction with no red shift effect; hence, there is no change of frequency, or red shift from its source.
A star going faster than the speed of light is also in direct opposition to the Einstein theory that when an object approaches the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite. Einstein taught that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Scientists have not been able to explain how a star can move faster than the speed of light. So who was wrong, Einstein, or all the scientists that believe Einstein's theories while simultaneously refuting Einstein's theories? We will learn that both are wrong.
It is possible that dust and gas could decrease the frequency and the speed of light, especially if the true nature of light is understood. With dust and gas in space, the greater the distance, the more that both the frequency and the speed of light would be decreased. Are scientists ignoring that possibility, or do they refuse to discuss dust and gas in space because it would negate their religion, their faith, their imagination and belief that the universe is billions of years old and the Big Bang theory and their justification for evolution? Intelligent Design Theory in the following sections will present evidence that evolution based on big bang and super massive black holes in space theory, the Edwin Hubble red shift and the theory of the universe expanding faster than the speed of light is based on one false conclusion after another rather than on science.
Big Bang Theory? What Are The Odds?
Aug, 2009
Big Bang Theory? What are the odds?
By Lowell's Notes
http://hubpages.com/hub/Big-Bang-Theory-What-are-the-odds
One of the facets of science is mathematics--I began looking at the Big Bang Theory through the spectrum of math and probability and came to the conclusion that it is an improbable theory. To be viable scientifically, there should be a quantifiable probability that it would even be possible. Let's ignore for the moment that there is no viable explanation of where the initial atoms came from. Or that, in all the vastness of the known universe these atoms could somehow find each other to initiate the explosion. (This alone, if quantified as a mathematical probability, would exceed a googleplex--or a google raised to the googleth power--a number that is so big that it cannot be written by a human in an entire lifetime.) Note: A google is a one followed by 100 zeros
Additionally, you have the obvious fact that there is no scientific evidence in any other case of order coming from chaos. Or, if it is possible, what are the odds? How could you quantify the odds of order coming from chaos? The initial odds are so staggering as to preclude any further belief that this could be true. With each step of order that came from the Big Bang, the odds of possibility decrease exponentially. Can you imagine the mathematical probability of each of the following being possible as a direct or indirect result of an explosion (however far removed in time from the initial blast):
• An explosion big enough to expand matter throughout the known universe but not eradicate all life forms? If this is true, then the nuclear threat is bogus.
• An explosion that created or began the evolution of the universe, our solar system, the earth, wind, rain, snow, frost, hail, clouds, light, darkness, life, variety of plants, animals, repetitive seasons, predictable weather, emotions, morals (this list could go on endlessly)?
When I considered the incredible complexity of the individual components listed above, I realized again that the mathematical probability that all of this order came from chaos requires more blind faith than I have (in false science).
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light (Genesis 1:1-3).
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist (Col 1:16-17).
_____________________________________
Are you saved? Are you ready for the tribulation to come? Are you headed to hell without hope and God?
Click here to go to our salvation page and learn how you can become born-again and live eternally.