When Is It Beneficial To Be Illegal?
The NAU To Be Formed
With Help Of Illegal Aliens
America Marches Towards The Kingdom Of The Anti-Christ
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness…Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! …they have cast away the law of the LORD of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.
(Isa. 5:10-24)
California Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants
Calif. court upholds in-state tuition for illegal immigrants
2010-11-15
By MSNCB.com
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40201035/ns/us_news-life/
SAN FRANCISCO — California court upholds in-state tuition for illegal immigrants. Justices say law is constitutional because U.S. residents also have access to the reduced rates. The California Supreme Court weighed in Monday on the politically charged immigration fray when it ruled that illegal immigrants are entitled to the same tuition breaks offered to in-state high school students to attend public colleges and universities. While the ruling applies only to California, the case was closely watched nationally because nine other states, including New York and Texas, have similar laws.
Republican congressmen Lamar S. Smith of Texas and Steve King of Iowa filed a so-called friends of the court brief urging that illegal immigrants be denied the reduced rate (See the switch in thinking here? Instead of keeping the law, just don't bother giving them reduced rates. The friends of the court are saying forget about their illegal status now, we are just going to give them reduced benefits. The law means nothing). The lawsuit considered by the court was part of a broader legal assault led by immigration legal scholar Kris Kobach, who has filed numerous cases across the country seeking to restrict the rights (what are the rights of law breakers?) of illegal immigrants. He represented a group of U.S. students who filed the lawsuit seeking to invalidate the California law. Kobach did not return a phone call seeking comment about the ruling in California. A unanimous state Supreme Court, led by politically conservative Justice Ming Chin, said the California provision was constitutional because U.S. residents also had access to the reduced rates.
The California Legislature passed the controversial measure in 2001 that allowed any student, regardless of immigration status, who attended a California high school for at least three years and graduated to qualify for in-state tuition at the state's colleges and universities. In-state tuition saves each state college student about $11,000 a year and each University of California student about $23,000 a year. A state appellate court ruled in 2008 the law was unconstitutional after a group of out-of-state students who are U.S. citizens filed a lawsuit. The suit alleged the measure violated federal prohibitions barring illegal immigrants from receiving post-secondary benefits not available to U.S. citizens based on state residency.
However, the state Supreme Court noted the California law says nothing about state residency, a distinction that foes of the plan said shouldn't matter. The Sacramento-based Pacific Legal Foundation, which supports numerous political efforts, said the spirit of federal law was to deny tuition breaks to illegal immigrants. "This court has received many briefs making policy arguments for and against section 68130.5's tuition exemption. We have received arguments that section 68130.5 affords deserving students educational opportunities that would not otherwise be available and, conversely, arguments that it flouts the will of Congress, wastes taxpayers' money, and encourages illegal immigration," the Supreme Court ruling noted.
"But this court does not make policy. Whether Congress's prohibition or the Legislature's exemption is good policy is not for us to say. Rather, we must decide the legal question of whether California's exemption violates Congress's prohibition or is otherwise invalid." Foundation attorney Ralph Kasarda, who submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said California was not in sync with the federal mandate against showing favoritism to illegal immigrants. "California's policy is also atrocious financial stewardship," he said. The state law also requires illegal immigrants who apply for the in-state tuition to swear they will attempt to become U.S. citizens (promise, pretty please with sugar on top, you will not keep breaking the laws of our country, pretty please). The applicants are still barred from receiving federal financial aid. "Through their hard work and perseverance, these students have earned the opportunity to attend UC," said University of California president Mark G. Yudof. "Their accomplishments should not be disregarded or their futures jeopardized."
Kobach also failed to invalidate a similar law in Kansas. His lawsuit in Nebraska is pending. The law professor was the chief drafter of Arizona's tough new laws against illegal immigrants, which is pending before a federal appeals court. He was elected earlier this month to serve as secretary of state in Kansas. Democratic leaders in Washington, D.C., are mulling whether to try to pass immigration reform measures before they lose control of the House of Representatives in January. During his re-election campaign, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., promised to try to get a vote on the "DREAM Act," which would create a path to citizenship for youth living in the country illegally who attend college or join the military.
White House spokesman Luis Miranda said the administration welcomes any opportunity for Congress to take up the proposal. The legislation "is important to both our national security and our economy," Miranda said. Meanwhile, retiring Republican Florida Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart is seeking a vote on proposed legislation giving states the option to allow illegal immigrant students to pay in-state tuition. "Allowing undocumented students to attend primary and secondary schools but requiring that they pay out-of-state tuition for college creates an unfair financial burden," Diaz-Balart said.
"Amnesty" Will Quickly Turn Into "North American Citizen"!
March 29, 2010
"Amnesty" Will Quickly Turn Into "North American Citizen"!
By CuttingEdge.ord
http://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/033110.html
NEWS BRIEF: "Next cramdown on taxpayers? It's amnesty and it's ba-a-ck!" World Net Daily, March 29, 2010 "A former member of Congress says the shooting death of an Arizona rancher on his own land is what will happen more and more unless America takes back its own borders – even as President Obama makes promises that ultimately could reward those who break federal laws to gain entrance to the U.S." "Obama's latest promises on immigration came as Congress passed his unprecedented takeover of health care ...'I have always pledged to be your partner as we work to fix our broken immigration system, and that's a commitment I reaffirm today," he said in a video message to open-borders supporters rallying in Washington the same day Congress approved 'Obamacare'."
This next segment comes as close to the truth as any in a long time. "...Democrats view illegal aliens as votes, and too many Republicans see the illegals as cheap laborers." Indeed, this issue is bipartisan. Republican President George W. Bush had eight long years in which he could have secured the Mexican-American borders. But, he did not. Bill Clinton likewise did not secure the border. President Obama is also not going to secure the border. Why on earth have these Presidents so completely "dropped the ball" on this issue? The answer is simple: these politicians -- Democrat and Republican alike -- do not share (the) view that these illegal aliens who have come across the border by the tens of millions should be (held accountable) in any way.
Their worldview on this subject is far different than ours, but they have not told you yet. These politicians understand that the ultimate goal is to eliminate the borders with Mexico to the south and Canada to the north, so that the North American Union may be established! Once the NAU is created, then the problem over illegal immigrants will disappear in a flash! All illegal immigrants will instantly become North American citizens. At that moment, all such immigrants will be granted 'de facto' amnesty, because their new citizenship will automatically grant it. This is the real goal of our politicians, as they are marching in lockstep toward the creation of Supernation #1 -- North American Union -- of the Illuminati's global plan to redraw all sovereign nations into only 10 Supernations. And, that, my friends, is another step in fulfilling the 2,600-year-old prophecy of Daniel 7:23-25.
As this news of amnesty and of securing our borders unfolds in your daily news, do not allow yourself to be distracted from keeping your eye on the correct target. The phony public rhetoric will try to keep you focused on these false words; rather, stay focused on the creation of the North American Union which will become the final solution of the illegal immigrant crisis.
Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time (Daniel 7:23-25).
And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful (Rev. 17:12-14).
_____________________________________
Are you saved? Are you ready for the tribulation to come? Are you headed to hell without hope and God?
Click here to go to our salvation page and learn how you can become born-again and live eternally.